“Control over processed data is the question primes can no longer defer”
The sovereign data layer under your C2.
Upper-layer systems replaceable without rebuilding data paths
- We are told there is no European alternative, so we keep buying the US platform.
- Our national leadership wants a German or European answer but the data layer is locked in.
- Swapping the C2 or AI vendor means re-plumbing every sensor and database connection.
- Upper-layer systems replaceable without rebuilding data paths
- You keep control over processed data — no vendor cloud in the data layer
- Accreditation and assurance you can defend
From today to the first result.
a US data platform underneath the C2 layer
Swapping the C2 or AI vendor means re-plumbing every sensor and database connection, and each sovereign bid needs proof that the stack is deterministic and auditable.
A vendor-neutral processing plane under C2 and AI: upper layers are replaceable without rebuilding the data path, and every workflow is signed and reproducible.
Run one existing data flow on the plane in a lab beside the current platform.
one flow, one labA language model on your own hardware. Step by step.
A local model answers a batch of prompts — no network, and the data stays on the machine.
- Prompt Source (CSV)CSV Subscriber
- Local LLM ProcessorLocalLLM.Processor
- CLI OutputCLI Processor
csv-prompts → CSV.Subscriber
llm-processor → LocalLLM.Processor
cli-output → ETL.CLIProcessor- Prompt Source (CSV)Reads rows from a CSV file in batches.
- Local LLM ProcessorAnswers each row with a local language model.
- CLI OutputPrints the rows as a table in the terminal.
A real workflow from our end-to-end test suite; the designer view is illustrated.
What you get. From the first pilot.
Upper-layer systems replaceable without rebuilding data paths
You keep control over processed data — no vendor cloud in the data layer
Accreditation and assurance you can defend
Why your tools fall short.
US hyperscaler/platform stacks create jurisdiction and vendor dependency regardless of local deployment.
Open-source assemblies (Kafka+Spark+Airflow) give sovereignty but no unified audit trail, determinism or single support owner.
Legacy integration middleware is slow and non-reproducible at sensor rates.
- Bundeswehr and German state-level debate on Palantir (2026, per Wikipedia summary)
- NATO Maven Smart System adoption (2025-2026) shaping interoperability expectations
- EDF 2021-2027 collaborative projects favouring European consortia (EC EDF page)
- EUDIS programme
Your pilot. Three steps.
Your data shape
Tell us what data you have, where it lives and what the result must be.
A scoped pilot
On your data and your hardware, with the success measure written down first.
A clear decision
You see the result against that measure — and keep every workflow and record.
Related roles in Sovereign & edge.
Bring us your hardest data problem. Let's solve it together.
A short pilot on your data and your hardware. We agree on what success looks like before we start.